행위

"낙서장"의 두 판 사이의 차이

라이언의 꿀팁백과

1번째 줄: 1번째 줄:


<nowiki>#</nowiki> Part I - Choose five of the words/phrases and create new sentences.


---


1. 신청인이 반드시 직접 비자 신청 센터를 방문해서 신청해야 하나요?
1. fair use


직접 신청하셔도 되고 제3인한테 위탁하여 접수하셔도 됩니다.단 지문채취 해당하시는 신청인은 반드시 직접 센터로 방문 하셔야 합니다.  
→ The fair use doctrine enables the Internet to be abundant with data.


비자 신청 센터는 한국 국민 또는 합법적으로 한국에 체류하는 기타 국가 국민의 비자 신청을 받습니다. 만약 신청인이 비자 신청 시 한국 내에 있지 않다면, 본 센터는 신청인의 신청을 접수할 수 없습니다. 신청인은 현재 체류하고 있는 국가의 비자 신청 센터에 신청을 하거나, 한국으로 돌아간 후에 신청을 해야 합니다.
---


2. 어느 정도의 여유를 두고 신청을 해야 하나요?
2. credibility


1개월 전에 신청할 것을 권유 드립니다. , 3개월보다 더 전에 하면 안 됩니다. [[/www.visaforchina.org/SEL4 KO/generalinformation/visaknowledge/274112.shtml|여기]]를 클릭하시면 비자 발급에 소요되는 시간을 보실 수 있습니다. 특수한 경우, 비자 발급 시간이 본 사이트에 표시된 시간보다 길어질 수 있습니다. 지연되는 경우, 본 센터의 직원이 즉시 신청인에게 통지해 드립니다.
→ We need to strive to create safe and reliable AI models. In other words, we aim to ensure the credibility of the AI models we develop.


3. 비자를 신청하기 전에 미리 예약을 해야 하나요?
---


주한 중국대사관 및 총영사관은 10월 23일부터 중국 비자 예약 신청을 전면 취소할 예정입니다. 신청인은 [[/bio.visaforchina.org/#/nav/appointmentForm%3Fuse%20type%3Dcenter%26visacenterCode%3DSEL4%26request%20locale%3Dko%20KR%26site%20alias%3DSEL4%20EN%26isAuthentication%3DN|여기]]를 클릭하시면 온라인신청서를 작성후 업무시간(근무일 기준9:00-15:00)에 예약없이 중국비자신청서비스센터에 방문하여 비자를 신청할 수 있습니다.
3. on edge


[[/bio.visaforchina.org/SEL4 KO/aboutus/274101.shtml|여기]]를 클릭하면 비자 신청 센터의 업무 시간과 주소를 볼 수 있습니다.
→ The kids in the family were on edge when their parents yelled at each other.


4. 비자 신청 센터에 도착하면 무엇부터 해야 하나요?
---


센터에 도착 후에는 아래의 순서에 따라 신청하십시오.
4. on the back of


(1) 번호표를 뽑은 다음 순서를 기다립니다.
→ I believe that God is on the back of those who are good and trustful in Him.


(2) 번호가 호명되면 해당 창구로 가서 신청을 합니다.
---


(3) 신청 접수가 끝나면 직원이 신청인에게 접수증을 드릴 것입니다. 접수증에는 신청인의 신청 정보와 여권 수령 예상 날짜가 적혀 있습니다.
5. hammer out something


(4) 접수증에 적힌 모든 내용을 빠짐없이 확인한 후, 의문 사항이 있으면 그 자리에서 직원에게 문의해 주십시오. 여권을 수령할 때 접수증을 제시해야 하므로, 접수증을 잘 보관해 주십시오.
→ After hours of intense discussion, the committee was finally able to hammer out the details of the requirements of the project.


5. 이미 신청한 비자를 취소할 수 있나요?
---


비자 신청 처리 절차가 복잡하기 때문에 본 센터에서는 접수한 신청을 철회할 수 없습니다. 일단 신청을 했으면 취소는 불가하며 비자수수료와 서비스수수료를 지불하셔야 합니다. 만일 급한 상황 또는 급히 중국으로 출국할 경우, 급행 신청을 하시기를 권유합니다.
<nowiki>#</nowiki> Part II Questions - Please write down the answers in the answer box below.


---


1. How does ChatGPT gather information, and what has led to the lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI?


→ ChatGPT collects a wide range of data from various sources, including websites on the internet and documents.


The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement and claiming that OpenAI has harmed their reputation by spreading misinformation.


---


ㅇ 자격종목 : SW테스트전문가(CSTS: Certified Softwre Test Specialist)
2. What are the key arguments presented by both The New York Times and OpenAI in this copyright infringement case?


ㅇ 등급정보: 고급등급(Advanced Level) ※ 등록민간자격(제2014-1321호)
→ Firstly, the licensing fee is a key point. The article mentions that The New York Times had attempted to negotiate a licensing deal for using their articles before filing the lawsuit.


ㅇ 시험일시: 10/28(토) 14:00~16:30
Secondly, the fair use doctrine, which permits the use of copyrighted material without permission under certain circumstances, is another crucial aspect. The outcome of this lawsuit could profoundly impact the way we handle data.


ㅇ 시험장소: 분당
---


ㅇ 접수일정: 현재 접수중(~10/18까지)
3. According to the article, what potential consequences or changes might this lawsuit bring to the digital publishing industry and AI technology?


-
→ Speaking of AI technology, the outcomes could be seriously disruptive if their use of data does not constitute fair use. As for the digital publishing industry, it could create another cash cow through licensing fees.


ㅇ 자격종목 : SW테스트전문가(CSTS: Certified Softwre Test Specialist)
---


ㅇ 등급정보: 일반등급(Foundation Level) ※ 국가공인 민간자격(과학기술정보통신부 제2019-01호)
4. Do you believe that AI entities like ChatGPT should be held accountable for using copyrighted material without explicit permission, or do you support the fair use argument presented by OpenAI? Why?


ㅇ 시험일시: 11/18(토) 14:00~15:30
→ Data are the lifeblood of AI technology, as AI models can only be trained with vast amounts of data. However, this data is not free. To produce it, companies must invest resources. Therefore, I believe a revised version of the fair use doctrine is necessary. For instance, what if the law only allowed companies to use public materials that were published more than two years ago?


ㅇ 시험장소: 수도권(서울역, 구로, 삼성, 분당), 대구, 광주
---


ㅇ 접수일정: 10/19(목) ~ 11/8(수) ※ 10/19 자정부터 온라인 접수가 가능합니다.
5. How might this lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI impact the future development and regulation of AI technologies in various industries, considering their use of copyrighted material?


→ Policymakers should revise the current copyright laws, as they are not suitable for new technologies like AI unless updated.
---


<nowiki>#</nowiki>
<nowiki>#</nowiki>
Some food for thoughts:
1. Case Tracker: Artificial Intelligence, Copyrights and Class Actions (New York Times v. Microsoft) (<nowiki>https://www.bakerlaw.com/new-york-times-v-microsoft/</nowiki>)
2. "Nightshade", defensive tool for artists against AI art generators, poisons AI training models that scrape their work without permission (<nowiki>https://amt-lab.org/reviews/2023/11/nightshade-a-defensive-tool-for-artists-against-ai-art-generators</nowiki>)
---





2024년 1월 29일 (월) 09:58 판

# Part I - Choose five of the words/phrases and create new sentences.

---

1. fair use

→ The fair use doctrine enables the Internet to be abundant with data.

---

2. credibility

→ We need to strive to create safe and reliable AI models. In other words, we aim to ensure the credibility of the AI models we develop.

---

3. on edge

→ The kids in the family were on edge when their parents yelled at each other.

---

4. on the back of

→ I believe that God is on the back of those who are good and trustful in Him.

---

5. hammer out something

→ After hours of intense discussion, the committee was finally able to hammer out the details of the requirements of the project.

---

# Part II Questions - Please write down the answers in the answer box below.

---

1. How does ChatGPT gather information, and what has led to the lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI?

→ ChatGPT collects a wide range of data from various sources, including websites on the internet and documents.

The New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging copyright infringement and claiming that OpenAI has harmed their reputation by spreading misinformation.

---

2. What are the key arguments presented by both The New York Times and OpenAI in this copyright infringement case?

→ Firstly, the licensing fee is a key point. The article mentions that The New York Times had attempted to negotiate a licensing deal for using their articles before filing the lawsuit.

Secondly, the fair use doctrine, which permits the use of copyrighted material without permission under certain circumstances, is another crucial aspect. The outcome of this lawsuit could profoundly impact the way we handle data.

---

3. According to the article, what potential consequences or changes might this lawsuit bring to the digital publishing industry and AI technology?

→ Speaking of AI technology, the outcomes could be seriously disruptive if their use of data does not constitute fair use. As for the digital publishing industry, it could create another cash cow through licensing fees.

---

4. Do you believe that AI entities like ChatGPT should be held accountable for using copyrighted material without explicit permission, or do you support the fair use argument presented by OpenAI? Why?

→ Data are the lifeblood of AI technology, as AI models can only be trained with vast amounts of data. However, this data is not free. To produce it, companies must invest resources. Therefore, I believe a revised version of the fair use doctrine is necessary. For instance, what if the law only allowed companies to use public materials that were published more than two years ago?

---

5. How might this lawsuit between The New York Times and OpenAI impact the future development and regulation of AI technologies in various industries, considering their use of copyrighted material?

→ Policymakers should revise the current copyright laws, as they are not suitable for new technologies like AI unless updated.

---

#

Some food for thoughts:

1. Case Tracker: Artificial Intelligence, Copyrights and Class Actions (New York Times v. Microsoft) (https://www.bakerlaw.com/new-york-times-v-microsoft/)

2. "Nightshade", defensive tool for artists against AI art generators, poisons AI training models that scrape their work without permission (https://amt-lab.org/reviews/2023/11/nightshade-a-defensive-tool-for-artists-against-ai-art-generators)

---



https://training.linuxfoundation.org/full-catalog/?_sft_product_type=certification&sscid=Cj0KCQiA1sucBhDgARIsAFoytUsecVAXiAtY9LyckP0E1MTdio0r2Ox0HojVG8qnvkWsmpqiqUNAS7kaAi79EALw_wcB&gclid=Cj0KCQiA1sucBhDgARIsAFoytUsecVAXiAtY9LyckP0E1MTdio0r2Ox0HojVG8qnvkWsmpqiqUNAS7kaAi79EALw_wcB


IT기업 관련 커리어 조언 추천추천

https://devkingdom.tistory.com/383


기술블로그 목록

https://awesome-devblog.netlify.app/


BERT 관련 학습자료


https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-transformer/

https://mchromiak.github.io/articles/2017/Sep/12/Transformer-Attention-is-all-you-need


#


https://harrisonjung.medium.com/%EC%8B%9C%EC%8A%A4%ED%85%9C%EB%82%B4%EC%9D%98-root-%EC%9D%B8%EC%A6%9D%EC%84%9C-%ED%99%95%EC%9D%B8%ED%95%98%EA%B8%B0-c8bf6ef1bfe8


https://hyeonseok.com/blog/900


REST Docs & Swagger UI

https://bbogle2.tistory.com/63


Google Cloud 에서 제공하는 컨테이너 기반의 Serverless 솔루션인 Cloud Run

https://medium.com/google-cloud-apac/gcp-serverless-%EC%84%9C%EB%B9%84%EC%8A%A4%EC%9D%B8-cloud-run-%EC%95%8C%EC%95%84%EB%B3%B4%EA%B8%B0-9%EB%B6%80-%EC%9E%98-%EC%95%88-%EC%95%8C%EB%A0%A4%EC%A1%8C%EC%A7%80%EB%A7%8C-%EC%A3%BC%EB%AA%A9%ED%95%A0%EB%A7%8C%ED%95%9C-2022%EB%85%84-%EC%97%85%EB%8D%B0%EC%9D%B4%ED%8A%B8-%EC%A0%95%EB%A6%AC-8899a43353f5


https://tunz.kr/post/4 Transformer


https://mygumi.tistory.com/437

https://coding-factory.tistory.com/445

https://berom.tistory.com/72

https://sansamlife.com/entry/IT%EC%B5%9C%EC%8B%A0%EC%A0%95%EB%B3%B4-GitHub-Copilot-X-AI-%EA%B8%B0%EB%B0%98-%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%EC%9E%90-%EA%B2%BD%ED%97%98


#커피컵홀더 #컵홀더 #슬리브 #sleeve #커피 #카페 #Cafe #coffee #드림라이크 #시청역커피 #광화문역커피 #을지로입구역커피 #작은카페 #꿈같은커피


https://sansamlife.com/entry/IT%EC%B5%9C%EC%8B%A0%EC%A0%95%EB%B3%B4-%EC%A2%8B%EC%9D%80-%ED%94%84%EB%A1%9C%EA%B7%B8%EB%9E%98%EB%A8%B8%EB%A5%BC-%EC%95%8C%EC%95%84%EB%B3%B4%EB%8A%94-5%EA%B0%80%EC%A7%80-%EA%B0%9C%EB%B0%9C%EC%9E%90-%EC%97%AD%EB%9F%89


#


1. Promise 함수 정리

https://mugglim.tistory.com/40


2. Servlet 기반으로 구동되는 웹서비스는 인증, 인가, 변환, 압축, 암호화 등 비즈니스 로직이 수행되기 전에 공통으로 사용되는 로직을 Servlet Filter로 구현한다. Servlet이 웹 요청을 처리하기 앞서 여러 Filter가 순서에 맞춰 수행되는 것이 Servlet 서버의 기본 동작 흐름

https://traeper.tistory.com/224


3. Java Object 클래스의 메소드 중에는 finalize() 라는 녀석이 있습니다. 아주 오래전 Java 태동기부터 존재했고 그 설계 의도도 명확했죠. 하지만 최근 몇년간 많은 문제점과 논란이 제기된 끝에 JDK 9 버전에서 Deprecated 되었고 결국 사라질 준비를 하고 있습니다. (JEP-421)


클래스의 생성(초기화) 시점에 리소스를 획득하고 종료 시점에 리소스를 다시 반납하는 패턴을 RAII(Resource Acqusition Is Initialization) 패턴 이라고 부릅니다. C++ 에서 주로 사용되는 패턴인데, GC 가 따로 없다보니 개발자가 직접 리소스를 할당하고 해제해주어야 했고 까딱 잘못하면 메모리 누수가 나곤했죠. 그래서 위 처럼 패턴을 만들어서 고착화 시킨겁니다.

https://jaeyeong951.medium.com/finalize-%EC%9D%80%ED%87%B4%EC%8B%9D-4a52fb855910


4. 검색 최적화

https://velog.io/@devstone/%EA%B2%80%EC%83%89-%EC%97%94%EC%A7%84-%EC%B5%9C%EC%A0%81%ED%99%94%EB%A5%BC-%EC%9C%84%ED%95%9C-%EA%B0%80%EC%9D%B4%EB%93%9C


5. 유용한 사이트

https://www.codingworldnews.com/

https://velog.io/

https://news.ycombinator.com/